John Deasy vs. Sarah Palin

In the wake of Los Angeles School Superintendent John Deasy first receiving a 91 percent Vote of No Confidence from his teachers and then a failing grade in their subsequent Performance Review (both in the Spring of 2013), questions must be asked. In the former vote, only 1,647 of LA’s 33,000 teachers expressed any confidence at all in Deasy while in the latter the vast majority of teachers who participated rated his performance below average or poor in every single one of their 25 performance areas. The ratio of poor to below average was often six to one. On a scale of one to five with five being highest, Deasy scored 1.36 overall. In a world where most teachers issue fails with anything below 60 percent, the Superintendent's grade was 27.2 percent. Had he somehow managed to double his score, he still would have fallen short of a D by more than six percentage points.

Given such dismal numbers, it is fair to ask would anyone be a more effective superintendent?  What about John Deasy vs. Sarah Palin, for example?

Let’s start with their educational backgrounds which are surprisingly similar. Sarah Palin enrolled at the University of Hawaii at Hilo in 1982. Shortly after arriving in Hawaii, she transferred to Hawaii Pacific University in Honolulu for a semester and then to North Idaho College for the spring and fall semesters of 1983. In August of 1984 Palin enrolled at the University of Idaho in Moscow for an entire academic year and then attended Matanuska-Susitna College in Alaska in the fall of 1985. Returning to the University of Idaho in Moscow which apparently sucked up all her units from all her other colleges and universities as if it was one giant academic vacuum cleaner, she received her degree in communications with an emphasis in journalism in May of 1987.

John Deasy began his PhD studies attending the State University of New York at Albany from 1991 to 1993 and earned 33 units, an astounding 8 units per semester. He then divided his time from 1997 to 2003 between the University of Rhode Island and Rhode Island College in a dual program. In those seven years of serious academic rigor, Deasy earned 44 units, barely 3 units per semester. Perhaps exhausted from that breath-taking 3-units-per-semester pace, Deasy then turned his attention to a fourth institution, the University of Louisville where he slaved away to earn a relatively astonishing 9 units for a single research course in the Spring  of 2004. How many 9-unit, single-semester classes does the University of Louisville offer, I wonder? How many does any university? Much like Palin’s University of Idaho, Deasy’s University of Louisville sucked up all of Deasy’s units from three different universities like a giant academic vacuum cleaner.  Deasy was awarded his PhD with stunning swiftness at the end of a single semester in May while the weather was still relatively nice.

Such an achievement is particularly remarkable when you stop to consider the fact a typical University of Louisville student at the time completed (and now in the wake of the Deasy fiasco is required to complete) its PhD program in approximately three years with at least one year in full time residency and a minimum of 18 units.

Palin narrowly defeated Deasy in the number of colleges and universities attended for a single degree by the narrow margin of five to four.

In June 2008, Northern Idaho College alumni gave Palin its Distinguished Alumni Achievement Award. To date John Deasy has been awarded No Distinguished Anything from Anybody.

In its 2013 Performance Review, of the 25 performance areas Los Angeles teachers rated Deasy the lowest in the area of his ability to positively influence the morale of the staff with 86 percent of teachers rating him below average or poor. More than six times as many rated him poor compared to below average. He was second lowest in his ability to spend money wisely according to the teachers with starkly similar numbers. In stark contrast to Deasy, Palin received the Miss Congeniality award and was awarded a college scholarship in finishing third in the Miss Alaska Pageant of 1984. Sarah Palin had already won the Miss Wasilla Beauty Pageant, an impossible feat for anyone lacking loads of congeniality. For Miss Alaska, Sarah Palin played the flute in the talent portion of the contest again in stark contrast to John Deasy who slashed arts spending in 2012.

While John Deasy has virtually destroyed staff moral in his two and a half years as LAUSD superintendent, Sarah Palin enjoyed approval ratings as high as 94% while governor of Alaska and is universally credited with single-handedly restoring the morale of the Republican Party when John McCain named her his Vice-Presidential running mate in August of 2008. McCain/Palin promptly surged ahead of Obama/Biden in national polls and remained there for quite some time. Newsweek and Time both put her on their covers. Morale was never higher in the Republican Party because of Palin.

Even at the nadir of her popularity while governor of Alaska in May of 2009, Sarah Palin received only a 42 percent vote of no confidence according to Hays Research, less than half of Deasy’s 91 percent.

Sarah Palin’s 400-page book Going Rogue: An American Life sold 300,000 copies the day it was released, a million copies in two weeks, spent six weeks on top of the New York Times Best Seller List, was the best-selling nonfiction book of the year in 2009, and sold 3,472,639 hardback copies in its first two years. In contrast, Deasy’s book, the 184-page An Analysis of Leadership: Investigating Superintendent Leadership in Context Within a Standards-Based, Non-Optional Reform Initiative fared less well with readers. Its release remains controversial as it is dated prior to his enrolling at the University of Louisville which accepted the book as Deasy’s dissertation. As Deasy’s PhD sponsor Robert Felner was later convicted of tax evasion and fraud and sentenced to 63 months in a federal penitentiary, it is questionable whether anyone besides Deasy ever read it at all. At 184 pages, one might reasonably ask if the book was even read by Deasy himself.

In 2010, Deasy became superintendent without so much as an interview, let alone a national search. McCain met Palin at the National Governor’s Meeting in February of 2008 and was “extraordinarily impressed.” On August 24, Palin’s candidacy was discussed in depth by McCain’s top advisors who reached a consensus and McCain personally spoke to Palin on the phone that same day. After an interview with Palin at his home on August 27, McCain formally “offered her the job.”

In 2010, Deasy immediately began firing what would become, at least at the time, a record number of teachers and promptly established himself as the most divisive superintendent in the country since Michelle Rhee’s similar teacher carnage and cheating scandals in Washington DC. He remains the most divisive in LAUSD history. In 2012, as a result of his mishandling of the Miramonte Child Abuse Scandal, Deasy’s teacher jails would swell from a few prisoners to more than five hundred and he would subsequently break his own teacher-firing record. He would displace more than a thousand primarily inner-city teachers from their positions and place them on track to be fired as well by ordering principals not to hire them under any circumstances. So much for teachers dedicating their lives to serving the city’s most desperate and needy children. Deasy views the acceptance of such a challenge and this level of dedication as a liability to be stamped out.

Simultaneous and in stark contrast to Deasy’s carnage beginning in 2010 and ever-increasing divisiveness which ultimately resulted in both the 2013 No Confidence Vote and failed Performance Review, Sarah Palin launched her Pink Elephant Movement which set about building coalitions and support for women candidates in both houses of Congress as well as State Capitols. Her success rate was 7 to 2 in the Senate, 7 to 6 in The House, and 6 to 3 when it came to State Governorships. Even Christine “I’m Not a Witch” O’Donnell’s political fortunes changed overnight with Palin’s endorsement allowing her to defeat the “unbeatable” Republican Establishment candidate Mike Castle in the Delaware primary. In November, Palin released her second book, America by Heart, which hit number two on the New York Times Best Seller List in its second week of release and was the fifth best-selling nonfiction book of 2010. Also in 2010, Sarah Palin was named one of the 100 most influential people in the world by Time Magazine.

Who would make a more effective superintendent? 

John Deasy or Sarah Palin?

AUTOBIOGRAPHY

I used to lead bicycle trips, primarily with teenagers. We would usually start in London, of course, and then travel west to various places like Stratford upon Avon, Oxford, Bath and Stonehenge, Salisbury and its magnificent cathedral, eventually heading south to Plymouth or Portsmouth for the boat to France. No Chunnel back then. We would ride from Cherbourg or Isle de Batz or some place to Dinan,  various parts of Northern France , depended upon the trip, then eventually take a train to Paris. Then either a train to Bern or perhaps cycle the Loire Valley or to Chartres, Orleans and then to bits of Germany (usually Bavaria), Austria, all over. I remember the endless and brutal hills of Devon nearly devouring me. I remember being saved by Devonshire Clotted Cream. We have nothing like that in the United States. I have no doubt that if Heaven exists, a scone with Devonshire Clotted Cream is one of  the first things they serve you.

Later, I began taking solo trips and those were the real epics. Since a teenager, I always wanted to see the Loch Ness Monster as I loved any and all "unsolved mysteries" and when I started cycling at 14 I always wanted to bicycle the Scottish Highlands. Approx. ten years ago I set out from London bound for Scotland and the Highlands in particular. At one point I left the confines of my "tourist map" of London, but still hadn't reached the countryside where I could wander the country roads listed on my Michelin maps. Those maps were so detailed, I think one inch equaled one inch. With no direction known, other than north, I just kept heading generally north on the outskirts of the city. At one point I came to a T in the road and in either direction I could see nothing heading north. So I waited for a passer by. Eventually a garbage truck came slowly up the street. I asked this rugged man which would be the best way to go if I wanted to head north. He said, "Where are you going?" I said, "North." He said, "I know that, but where?" I said, "North. I just need to head north." He said, "But where north?" I said, "Well eventually I want to hit Scotland." I wish I could describe the look on that man's face. It was like I had answered, "The North Pole." He looked across at his partner and said something like, "My God. This bloke is riding his push bike all the way to Scotland." I think he pointed to the right just out of confusion.

I meandered all over the Yorkshire Dales and stumbled into the Lake District. I had no idea so much of England was north of London. On the tiny globes we have in school, London looks like it is roughly in the middle. And I'd ridden south to the Channel many times. I figured it couldn't be that much further. As it turned out, I miscalculated. From the Lake District I finally made it to the border at Jedburg where I meandered my way eventually to Edinborough.  Eventually I was at Stirling Castle, Loch Lomand and indeed Loch Ness. Didn't see the monster. In fact it was raining so hard when I got there, that although the hostel is right on the Loch, I barely even saw the Loch. I rode to the top at John O'Groats, took a boat to Orkney Island and to this day wear a silver bracelet and ring from that wonderful island 24/7. Just recently I took them off for the first time in many, many years. I did it begrudgingly. But I needed an MRI of my wrist. Nothing short of an MRI will pry that jewelry off my wrist and finger.

Back on the mainland, I headed west through the endless clouds of midges  (no-see-'ems)  to catch a boat to the Outer Hebrides. From there I turned south island hopping from island to island until I reached the Inner Hebrides and the Isle of Skye, Iona and lord knows where all. Eventually I ran out of time and had to catch a train back to London. It wasn't too long after they'd deregulated British Rail. What a wise move that was. Do we thank Margaret Thatcher for that or Tony Blair? Suspect it was Thatcher. No one else could be that stupid. Anway, with a thousand deregulated rail lines, it was virtually impossible to get even to Glasgow with a bicycle, let alone London. Through some freak miracle of nature, they managed to cobble a train trip for the two of us back to London. It wasn't easy. The poor woman in the station nearly had a heart attack trying to print me the tickets I needed. I was certain I'd never see my bicycle again.

I have many of these stories. Countless stories. I have two different, but similar adventures in Spain/Portugal alone. My Bath adventure will have to wait. But that widely meandering trip from London to Orkney, the Hebrides and back was really something. I spent time with Sylvia Plath, Beatrice Potter, the Bronte Sisters; I went all over the place.

As I sit here writing in my den/office/bedroom, there is a picture of me with my bicyle (including full camping gear) on the bookshelf right behind me. I am standing on the photo rock at John O'Groats. August 4, 2002. One arrow points to Lands End  (the southernmost tip of England, you guys) , 874 miles away. My route from London may have carried me twice that far. Another arrow points to Los Angeles some 5,953 miles from home.

It appears I weighed less than I do now.

In the meantime, I will say this about Bath. I received one of the best kisses I have ever received in my life somewhere around three or four in the morning in Bath. I had met some "locals" in a cellar bar dating back to something like 1400. They took a shine to me. The atmosphere was as thick as shepherd's pie. I loved it. They took me to some after hours club. A fair bit of drinking occured prior to the after hours and the after hours for some reason gave us no reason to slow down. I was hours away from having to bicycle to Stonehenge on the way to the cathedral and youth hostel in Salisbury. The girlfriend of one of the young men decided to kiss me goodbye. Though standing right in front of him, she did not kiss me like someone with a boyfriend. Instead, she kissed me like someone without a boyfriend for the last three hundred years. She kissed me like she was long overdue. I kissed her back or perhaps more accurately just tried to keep up. I was not too successful in that regard.

Though it came somewhere in the mid 1980's, to this day I'm not entirely sure I've recovered from that kiss.

The vicious, mercilous headwind that struck us every inch of the way to Stonehenge and Salisbury did nothing to assuage my hangover when the teenagers woke me up after breaking back into the hostel and a few hours of sleep at most. Quite the opposite, in fact.

That kiss may have helped.

But not much.

-Joseph K

Deasy Must Go

Written March 31, 2012 and published with supporting documentation and links on K12NewsNetwork April 2nd,  "Deasy Must Go" has been the most widely read and circulated of Joseph K's articles. Ironically, Joseph K never published it on his own blog. Given the current defeat of the billionaire-backed reform candidates on the LAUSD school board, the backlash against LAUSD Superintendent Deasy's war against teachers (teacher jail) and the newly elected School Board President by a 5-2 vote (Richard Vladovic, a man Deasy swore would result in his resignation should Vladovic be elected), it seems appropriate to republish it here and now. The previous link produced a maelstrom of anti-Deasy comments by LA Times readers. I have added one contemporary link at the bottom in regards to Deasy's plan for LAUSD school children to face an endless barrage of tests beginning in August, 2013. "Just who will profit?" (Short answer: Pearson and Apple).

Now more than ever, Deasy Must Go.

It is time for Deasy to go.  

After robbing poor, minority children of recess in the name of test prep in Prince George’s County years ago, he left nothing but wreckage and enmity as a district superintendent in Maryland. Deasy said, “Lessons at schools missing testing goals have to be very targeted, and there often isn't time for electives and free play like at other schools.” Tough break for poor, primarily black children.

 

Ditto Santa Monica, where ex-Superintendent Deasy is now universally despised. Deasy has a knack for being universally despised.

He was awarded a fraudulent PhD from Louisville after only six months attendance and just nine units of coursework by a professor (Robert Felner), whom Deasy later repaid with more than $375,000 of “consulting” contracts in Santa Monica.  Substance News had this to say:

According to a highly placed source, formerly at UL, Deasy’s dissertation’s title page carries the date, May, 2003, while it is signed off, April 9, 2004. He entered the program in January, 2004. A UL investigation of the Deasy PhD did not condemn the practice.

James Ramsey, UL president, who had turned a blind eye to Felner’s notorious corruption (the faculty gave Felner a “no confidence vote” in 2006, but he served at least two more years at UL with Ramsey’s full support), gave his nod to the “blue ribbon” investigation.

However, the UL handbook clearly states that a PhD candidate must spend two years on campus. More, it usually takes most students a minimum of three years. In addition, UL rarely allows a student to transfer more than six credits.

Deasy, after allegations rose up about his imaginary degree but before the investigation, was quoted in the Washington Post as saying, “If the university made errors in the awarding of the degree, I do hope they rescind it. My responsibility is to do everything I was advised and told to do. If I was advised wrong and given wrong information, the university needs to take responsibility for that. I certainly would not want anything unearned.”

Professor Felner was later sentenced to prison for more than five years for defrauding the federal government and urban school districts of $2.3 million. Here in LA, there were inconsistencies in Deasy’s resume. He claimed to have taught at Loyola, though Loyola had never heard of him.

More recently, Deasy laid waste to Miramonte Elementary School, illegally transferring more than a hundred teachers, every adult in the building in fact, without even the pretense of a shred of evidence of wrong doing against any of them, thereby further traumatizing already severely traumatized children.

The story gets worse.

Though cleared of all wrong doing more than two weeks ago by the Sherriff’s department, Miramonte teachers remain in exile in a brand new high school the District saw fit to never open. Their careers and reputations now possibly forever destroyed, they sit helpless day after day in a building with no children talking among themselves, staring at walls. They are sitting in limbo day after day in Deasy’s Guantanamo Bay.

Meanwhile, what is happening to the children at Miramonte? Do they have one or two new teachers? Do they like their new teacher(s)? Who are these teachers?

Parents ask, “Where did these new teachers come from? Are they any good? How do these new teachers know what has already been taught if they just arrived the next day? Are they all just starting over? How long will they stay?”

How much has all this cost (and I don’t mean just money), but I do have a feeling several lawsuits at least will have quite a say one day.

Deasy cares not a whit about education, children, or teachers. He cares only for his own personal ambition and standardized test data.

“Data should drive instruction,” he drones on and on and on.

 

He reduces curriculum to test prep, then fires inner-city principals and demonizes teachers by closing inner-city schools, or giving them away to private charter companies when they don’t drive data fast enough. Many of these benefiting for-profit charter companies contribute significantly to Deasy-supporting school board member reelection campaigns.  Add to that all of the Gates and Broad Foundations’ money? Gates was Deasy’s former employer and Broad is his mentor. Who is in whose pocket?

To quote Susan Ohanian, Deasy’s record “reads like the tombstone inscription for the death of childhood.”

Ditto for teacherhood. He wants to make each and every scurrilous charge by an LAUSD principal or administrator (no matter how baseless, ill-conceived, or malevolent) a part of a teacher’s permanent record. No evidence required. Scandalous.

Under Deasy, 9,300 layoff notices were sent to teachers, librarians, nurses, psychologists, one out of four members of UTLA. One out of four. So eager to layoff teachers was Deasy, that he sent quite a few individuals not just one, but two or even three layoff notices. Erasing adult education, early childhood, and School Readiness Language Development Programs are just the tip of the Deasy’s iceberg. Music and the arts are also mostly toast thanks to Deasy. Creativity? Who needs it?

Late last year, Deasy dissolved the District Advisory Committee which for 30 years has allowed parents to monitor and advise the use of Federal Title I funding. He banned it’s duly elected members from Parent Centers as well as all LAUSD property. In some instances, DAC members were visited at their homes and pulled out of meetings by LAUSD police, while others were threatened by District administrators with deportation. This is Deasy’s hallmark, an atmosphere of fear and an absence of both compassion and ethics. LAUSD now faces a $2.5 billion class-action lawsuit for misuse of Title I funds.

With no oversight, comes no accountability. With no accountability, comes no restraint. He raised the poverty level required to qualify for federal funds from forty to fifty percent, thereby eliminating millions of federal tax dollars to twenty-three District schools. Deasy is keeping the money. LACES alone (one of LA’s first and most successful magnet schools) will lose $400,000 next year. How much is $400,000 times twenty-three?

But even that isn’t enough for the insatiable Deasy. Now he’s taking from Title II and III too. Unbelievable. At what point does theft become an issue? Title I, II and III funds are from the federal government. They are our tax dollars. Title I goes to the poor including food for hungry children. Food? Who needs it? Title II improves instruction. Title III goes to those with limited English. Not any more. Much of it now goes to Deasy. Schools will just have to make do.

It is one thing to abuse teachers, but quite another to steal from poor, hungry, minority, limited-English speaking students. You do not steal federal government money. You do not steal from children period.

You do not steal libraries. You do not steal preschool. If you want to really destroy poor, minority children, there is no better way to do it than by eliminating preschool programs. Preschool is the single greatest determinant of future academic success in inner-city schools. It is the most efficient use of education dollars.

Not any more, thanks to Deasy.

What does he want all this money for? Testing. Testing, testing, testing, and more testing. Deasy seems to believe the best way to fatten a starving calf is to buy it more scales.

“Forget Music. Forget art. Your number two pencil had better be sharp!”

Though Deasy’s initial investments and projections remain secret, it must be in the hundreds of millions. Massive consulting contracts already go out to testing companies with very little oversight. This is just a down payment. If Deasy gets his way, the testing regimes of NCLB will look like a quiz by comparison. Pre-tests, post-tests, and interim assessments. He wants to quantify child development with a bold bubble strategy. Despite their limited scope and reliability issues often exceeding fifty percent, Deasy wants to use standardized test increases or decreases to evaluate, then fire teachers. That means every student must be tested by every teacher many times each year.

You cannot evaluate some subjects and not others (unless you teach in Tennessee where teachers are now evaluated in grades and subjects they don’t even teach). 

Deasy’s wants to impose a value added measure (VAM) to evaluate teachers. VAM was invented by Dr. William Sanders, a statistician working in the field of agricultural genetics at the University of Tennessee in the 1980's. He was, quite literally, a bean counter. He believed he could use his statistical models used to produce plump, ripe tomatoes (and probably beans) to evaluate teaching. Then Governor Lamar Alexander said, "Go for it." Unfortunately, children are neither tomatoes nor beans and teaching is not agriculture.

To “prevent” teaching to the tests, the tests will have to be new and different each and every year. How else can you “prevent” teaching to a test when teachers’ jobs are at stake and those teachers, no matter how moral, have already seen the test? How will it be fair if some teach to the tests while others don’t, in favor of skills such as oral language, written expression, creativity, and divergent thinking? Standardized tests penalize divergent thinking. They teach false truths, such as the idea there is only one answer or just one which is best. Is it the result of bad teaching when hungry children in the city find shading endless bubbles for the umpteenth time every year too tedious to regard?

Hundreds of millions is just a down payment. Just who will profit? 

For how long?

And what for?

It is time for Deasy to go.

Deasy's Prayer

Our Father who art in VAM,

hallowed be VAM's name.

VAM's kingdom come.

VAM's will be done 

in schools as it is in Heaven.

Give us this day our daily VAM,

and forgive us our trespasses,

as we forgive those who trespass against VAM.

(Just kidding. Trespassing is illegal, so we will persecute agressively.) 

And lead us not into true teaching,

but deliver us from creativity

(and divergent thinking).

For VAM is the kingdom,

and the power,

and the glory,

for ever and ever.

aVAM